Thursday, April 3, 2008

Sitting in the Aisle?

Right now, I’m imagining a church sanctuary, divided right down the middle by a solitary aisle. On the left side sit all the churchgoers who may read the Bible, and even believe the parts that they like--in other words, nominal, moderate, and liberal Christians. On the right side sit all the churchgoers who believe that the Bible is God’s Word and not something to be twisted, taken out of context, or brushed aside--a.k.a., conservative evangelicals.

In my imaginary edifice, which happens to resemble the ecclesiastical incarnation of Congress, I’m trying to figure out, “What side would John McCain sit on?”

I’m starting to think that he would sit in the aisle. On the one hand, he wants the fellowship and support of the "right side" of this church. He desires that identity. But, deep down in his heart, he seems to belong right in the middle, or even on the left side.

I believe this is the case for a few reasons:

First, he called Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson “agents of intolerance.” Now, there are many ways that you could describe these two Christian leaders, including “insensitive” or “lacking discretion” for their post-9/11 sentiments. But McCain utilized terminology that is usually reserved for the “anything goes” liberal left. McCain reportedly reconciled with Falwell, but one has to wonder whether his original statements were sincere, and his latter statements were for political expediency.

Then, McCain said that he doesn’t think homosexuality is a sin, a view that goes right along with his opposition to a federal marriage amendment (although he doesn’t support gay marriage).

Moreover, WORLD Magazine, in the article “Divided We Stand,” described what happened when McCain was asked about his faith at a gathering of the CNP:

McCain launched into the story he has told often about a prison guard in North Vietnam who showed him compassion and once, in the prison yard, drew the sign of the cross in the dirt at McCain's feet, then quickly brushed it away. The story received polite applause. Later Family Research Council head Tony Perkins told WORLD, "He had a golden opportunity to talk about his faith.Instead, he talked about the faith of his guard. It was a great story, but not what we were looking for." Bill Owens, founder and president of the Coalition of African-American Pastors, was more direct: "It was a disaster. It just proves he has no clue what we're about."

McCain is pro-life but he has supported embryonic stem-cell research, causing one to question his convictions on the issue and whether he fully grasps the issue at hand. As James Dobson has said, “You can’t truly be pro-life” if you advocate the killing of babies—even those least developed as embryos. These concerns are further legitimized by the fact that he thinks rape and incest exceptions are appropriate. Apparently, he feels that one sin (rape or incest) justifies another (killing a baby). Beyond that, he would give the “benefit of the doubt” to any abortion seeker alleging rape. In other words, abortion rates might not decline all that much, while "rape rates" would rise, unless some sort of restrictions were put on claiming rape. Not to mention, he would also give the benefit of the doubt to any state which decided to keep abortion legal. He supports the overturning of Roe v. Wade (although he hasn’t always supported such a judicial move), but he does not support a Human Life Amendment to the Constitution.

On a personal level, John McCain’s infidelity may also end up being an issue with conservative Christian voters. Like it or not, McCain needs to address and fully disclose that issue. Can he admit that he sinned, failed, yielded to temptation?
He needs to say more than that he is a “believer in redemption.” He needs to say, “I really need to be redeemed.”

As of now, McCain just doesn’t seem to understand what makes conservative Christians’ clock tick, and time is running short for him to figure that out.

I honestly don’t think McCain can, with much credibility, synchronize his watch to that clock by November. In my opinion, the best way for him to get the gears turning in his favor is the selection of a true conservative Christian as a running mate, someone who can walk the walk and talk the talk, two things seemingly beyond McCain’s capacity.

And why not former presidential candidate Mike Huckabee? Does he have his political downsides? Well, yes. By little fault of his own, he may turn off the Mormon community, along with the “Mitt Romney community” in general. But the substantial and enthusiastic evangelical constituency which he represents may outweigh any negatives that he brings to the table. In any case, McCain must recognize that the evangelical voting bloc is not something to be taken for granted, and that we will not easily be fooled by a little election-year pandering.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I believe 100 percent that McCain will not be able to 'fake' being a conservative christian... there is no way he could satisfy what most social conservatives will be looking for by Nov.

He will definately need a verifiable socon VP if he wants enthusisasm out of that base.

In the big picture though.. the devil I know here, is starting to scare me a lot less than the devils I don't on the other side.

If JM doesn't pick Huckabee.. I hope he at least picks someone who is acceptable to ALL conservatives, and not just to the ficon banch as appears to be the push with Romney.

Anonymous said...

If I have read your blog correctly, what you have just proposed is a religious litmus test for elected officials. Personally, I don't care if a President worships little green men from Mars in private if he/she is a proven leader.

This kind of test cuts both ways. Mike Huckabee, who is a proven leader, was forced out of the race by just this kind of religious litmus test played in reverse.

It is past time, for the sake of progress and to avert the kind of political gridlock we have been inflicted with for the last 4 years, to take religion off the table when it comes to political candidates. We need a "don't ask, don't tell" policy on faith and politicians.

Faith is a topic guaranteed to produce great heat and little light in non-homogenious groups. Groups like the Statehouse, Congress and your average workplace.

Kingdom Advancer said...

2nd Anonymous commenter,

I just can't agree with you. For me, a genuine worshipper of God is not interchangeable with a worshipper of "little green men from Mars".

Then, I also don't think we should be taking religion "off the table," because that suggests "out of the discussion" and even "out of the public square." I believe that is the wrong way to go.

Anonymous said...

McCain has an important decision to make in selecting his VP. He must pull in the conservative base and not alienate the independents. The best person to do this is Mike Huckabee; he is an authentic conservative who has a compassion for all. He is frugal as has been seen with his campaign financing, and we certainly need fiscal conservatism in the Washington. He knows how to create jobs in this country and not ship them overseas and is strong on the border being endorsed by Duncan Hunter and Jim Gilchrist. Huckabee is the man of the VP job.

Anonymous said...

I hope that John McCain chooses Mit or someone that will really turn conservatives off. Maybe then they’ll start looking a third party options that you can vote for without compromising your standards.

hsmith4huck, if Huckabee is strong on the boarder, than why did the Minutemen say that he was in no way shape or form speaking for them? The way that I heard it, he was big on amnesty.

kingdom advancer, I like what you’re doing on this site, I just don’t think you’re taking it far enough.

I support the Constitution Party.

Kingdom Advancer said...

Daniel,

Huckabee supported in-state tuition for children of illegal immigrants, with a citizenship application as a prerequisite. He didn't support amnesty. That said, of course he wouldn't be as attractive to anti-illegal immigration stalwarts as, say, a Tom Tancredo would be.

I'm glad you like what I'm doing. I'm trying to balance my hardcore principles with the principle of getting the most bang out of my voting buck, keeping the worst candidates out of office (Barack or Hillary).

I'm in a holding pattern right now, waiting to see who McCain will pick as VP, how he will conduct himself for the rest of the campaign, whether the Republican Party will give Huckabee an honorable speaking slot at the convention, and whether any group will make a serious push for a third-party candidate.